But instead, I saw this in my server logs: I also created the frontend/entrypoints/application.css file to point to my styles/index.css (previously used by esbuild to compile the app/assets/builds/application.css).Īfter these minor chages, I expected my application to work without any additional changes (backed by the Vite Ruby auto build feature).
You can find the corresponding commit here. I replaced the javascript_include_tag and stylesheet_link_tag helpers with vite_javascript_tag and vite_stylesheet_tag respectively, and updated the sourceCodeDir value in vite.json to frontend (since my setup deviates from the Rails app/javascript approach).
Could not connect to livereload server install#
Migrating from ” bundling-rails” to Vite was almost as simple as stated in the vite_rails documentation: install the gem and run the installation rake task ( bundle exec vite install). In this post, I’d like to share my Vite Ruby setup (using the An圜able demo) and I’ll cover the following topics: So, the question is: what is the modern alternative to webpack-dev-server? And my answer is Vite. But for many developers, instant feedback is important, they got used to it. The problem is that they provide a Sprockets-like experience, that is, build-oriented. The Rails team works hard to improve the documentation around the modern Asset Pipeline and the variety of available choices. Well, except maybe for the confusion this diversity can cause developers. All of these were built on top of modern tooling, play nice with Rails, and are easy to work with. Webpacker has been retired instead, we have a handful of official ways of dealing with frontend: import maps, jsbundling-rails, cssbundling-rails, tailwindcss-rails. Rails 7 turned a new page in the history of asset bundlers. Although it served its purpose well, it always felt like Webpacker was a “foreign body” in the Rails ecosystem. Then, the frontend revolution began, and we, the Rails community, needed to catch up. That was an important step forward for the entire world of web development frameworks, not only for Ruby and Rails. Rails has had an answer to the assets problem since the Assets Pipeline ( Sprockets) was introduced. Luckily, Vite Ruby had been on my radar for quite some time, so I decided to give it a try. Switching back to Webpacker in 2022 was not a good idea. As a result, assets:precompile became fast as lightning, but we lost one important productivity feature along the way: live reloading. Successfully compiled 1 file with Babel (110ms).Recently, I upgraded my An圜able demo application to Ruby 3 and Rails 7 with its new asset management tooling. Saw change to /home/user/projects//webapp/controller/.map Successfully compiled 1 file with Babel (112ms).
.jpg "could not connect to livereload server")
Reloading: /home/user/projects//webapp/controller/ Saw change to /home/user/projects//webapp/controller/ URL: Saw change to /home/user/projects//webapp/controller/.map Info server:custommiddleware:livereload Livereload server started! Info server:custommiddleware:livereload Livereload connecting to port 35729 for path webapp LiveReload is waiting for a browser to connect.Įxtensions: xml,json,properties,html,css,js,png,gif,jpg,php,php5,py,rb,erb,coffee Info normalizer:translators:ui5Framework Using SAPUI5 version: 1.90.13 Successfully compiled 4 files with Babel (1666ms). > babel src -out-dir webapp -source-maps true -extensions ".ts.js" -copy-files -watch In the console it shows: prepend-node-path` option to include the path for the node binary npm was executed with. When I change something in the code, for example in the controller the browser reload does not get triggered. I am using Business Application Studio to develop UI5 applications and the app can be started with `npm run start` statement. I followed this tutorial to create UI5 application based on Typescript.
0 kommentar(er)
